Proposing New Measures

So far, the data from Northeastern’s BlueBike stop in Boston has been helpful for understanding mobility patterns and user behavior, which are essential aspects of urban informatics. By exploring this dataset, we can understand how people utilize the BlueBike service, identify factors affecting rider engagement or satisfaction, and inform urban planning decisions related to this type of transportation infrastructure and public services.

Analysis: In this analysis, I focused on examining the Ride Frequency and Duration Patterns among BlueBike riders, categorized by rider type (casual vs. member), using the BlueBike dataset from January 2024 (bluebikes_202401_nu).

Process Explanation: To analyze the Ride Frequency and Duration Patterns in the BlueBike dataset, I used the R program to generate a few graphs to describe my data. Firstly, the dplyr package was utilized to aggregate and summarize the dataset based on rider type (member_casual). This involved calculating the Frequency of Bike Usage (number of trips) and Average Trip Duration for both casual riders and members. The group_by() function was used to group the data by rider type, followed by summarise() to compute the desired metrics (n_distinct(ride_id) for Frequency and mean(TripDuration) for Average Trip Duration). Visualizations were then created using ggplot2 to represent these findings graphically, allowing for a clear comparison between rider types in terms of usage behavior and trip duration. The resulting graphs show another picture into rider engagement and preferences within Northeastern BlueBike users,, informing potential strategies for urban planning and future BlueBike plans.

A graph of a number of trips

Description automatically generated
A graph of a graph

Description automatically generated

Findings: 

  1. Frequency of Bike Usage by Rider Type:
    1. The graph illustrates that there are approximately four times as many members (subscribed riders) compared to casual riders within the dataset. This indicates a higher level of engagement and consistent usage among members of the BlueBike program.
  2. Average Trip Duration by Rider Type:
    1. The average trip duration for casual riders is around 16 minutes, whereas it is approximately 10 minutes for members. This suggests that casual riders tend to take longer trips on average compared to members, who typically opt for shorter-duration rides.

A screenshot of a computer program

Description automatically generatedInterpretation: The observed differences in ride frequency and trip duration between casual riders and members of BlueBike highlights the differences in usage behaviors and preferences between these two groups. The higher frequency of bike usage among members reflects how any additional trip is free, while the longer average trip duration for casual riders may indicate leisurely or exploratory rides.

Implications for Boston’s Communities: Understanding Ride Frequency and Duration Patterns has significant implications for urban planning and transportation policy in Boston. Insights gained from this analysis can inform decisions related to BlueBike infrastructure such as station placement, as well as strategies for how they market to the two groups, members and casual riders.

Transferability: The methodology used in this analysis can be applied to similar datasets from other cities with bike-sharing programs, or to other popular BlueBike stations in Boston, such as the ones in the MIT area. The principles of analyzing ride frequency and duration patterns are transferable to other questions and topics in urban informatics, such as other subscription-based services such as having an unlimited T pass.


Leave a comment